We said that the Laplace transformation of a product is not the product of the transforms. All hope is not lost however. We simply have to use a different type of a “product.” Take two functions and defined for , and define the convolutionto the power 1 of and as
(6.3.1)
As you can see, the convolution of two functions of is another function of .
The convolution has many properties that make it behave like a product. Let be a constant and , , and be functions then
The most interesting property for us, and the main result of this section is the following theorem.
In other words, the Laplace transform of a convolution is the product of the Laplace transforms. The simplest way to use this result is in reverse.
Solving ODEs
The next example demonstrates the full power of the convolution and the Laplace transform. We can give the solution to the forced oscillation problem for any forcing function as a definite integral.
Volterra Integral Equation
A common integral equation is the Volterra integral equationsquared
where and are known functions and is an unknown we wish to solve for. To find , we apply the Laplace transform to the equation to obtain
where , , and are the Laplace transforms of , , and , respectively. We find
To find we now need to find the inverse Laplace transform of .
Footnotes
[1] For those that have seen convolution defined before, you may have seen it defined as . This definition agrees with (6.3.1) if you define and to be zero for . When discussing the Laplace transform the definition we gave is sufficient. Convolution does occur in many other applications, however, where you may have to use the more general definition with infinities.
[2] Named for the Italian mathematician Vito Volterra (1860–1940).
Adapted from Differential Equations for Engineers by Jiří Lebl (Oklahoma State University), hosted on LibreTexts (math.libretexts.org) and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changes were made. License: CC-BY-SA-4.0.