Precalculus with Integrated CalculusXYZ Homework Edition

⇩ Download ▾

14.3 The Polar Form of Complex Numbers

In this section, we return to our study of complex numbers which were first introduced in Section 2.4. Recall that a complex number is a number of the form z = a + b i where a and b are real numbers and i is the imaginary unit defined by i = 1 .

The number a is called the real part of z , denoted Re ( z ) , while the real number b is called the imaginary part of z , denoted Im ( z ) . From Intermediate Algebra, we know that if z = a + b i = c + d i where a , b , c and d are real numbers, then a = c and b = d , which means Re ( z ) and Im ( z ) are well-defined.1

To start off this section, we associate each complex number z = a + b i with the point ( a , b ) on the Cartesian (rectangular) coordinate plane. In this case, the x -axis is relabeled as the real axis, which corresponds to the real number line as usual, and the y -axis is relabeled as the imaginary axis, which is demarcated in increments of the imaginary unit i . The plane determined by these two axes is called the complex plane.

Coordinate-plane figure.
Figure 14.173

The Complex Plane

Since the ordered pair ( a , b ) gives the rectangular coordinates associated with z = a + b i , the expression z = a + b i is called the rectangular form of the complex number z .

We could just as easily associate z with a pair of polar coordinates ( r , θ ) . Although it is not as straightforward as the definitions of Re ( z ) and Im ( z ) , we give r and θ special names in relation to z below.

Some remarks about Definition 14.1 are in order. We know from Section 14.1 that every point in the plane has infinitely many polar coordinate representations ( r , θ ) which means it's worth our time to make sure the quantities `modulus', `argument' and `principal argument' are well-defined.

Concerning the modulus, if z = 0 then the point associated with z is the origin. In this case, the only r -value which can be used here is r = 0 . Hence for z = 0 , | z | = 0 is well-defined.

If z 0 , then the point associated with z is not the origin, and there are two possibilities for r : one positive and one negative. However, we stipulated r 0 in our definition so this pins down the value of | z | to one and only one number. Thus the modulus is well-defined in this case, too.2

Even with the requirement r 0 , there are infinitely many angles θ which can be used in a polar representation of a point ( r , θ ) . If z 0 then the point in question is not the origin, so all of these angles θ are coterminal. Since coterminal angles are exactly 2 π radians apart, we are guaranteed that only one of them lies in the interval ( π , π ] , and this angle is what we call the principal argument of z , Arg ( z ) .

The set arg ( z ) of all arguments of z can be described as arg ( z ) = { Arg ( z ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } . Note that since arg ( z ) is a set, we will write ` θ arg ( z ) ' to mean ` θ is in3 the set of arguments of z '.

If z = 0 then the point in question is the origin, which we know can be represented in polar coordinates as ( 0 , θ ) for any angle θ . In this case, we have arg ( 0 ) = ( , ) and since there is no one value of θ which lies ( π , π ] , we leave Arg ( 0 ) undefined. It is time for an example.

Now that we've had practice computing the modulus of a complex number, we state some properties below.

To prove the first three properties in Theorem 14.3, suppose z = a + b i where a and b are real numbers. To determine | z | , we find a polar representation ( r , θ ) with r 0 for the point ( a , b ) .

From Section 14.1, we know r 2 = a 2 + b 2 so that r = ± a 2 + b 2 . Since we require r 0 , then it must be that r = a 2 + b 2 , which means | z | = a 2 + b 2 . Using the distance formula, we find the distance from ( 0 , 0 ) to ( a , b ) is also a 2 + b 2 , establishing the first property.4

For the second property, note that since | z | is a distance, | z | 0 . Furthermore, | z | = 0 if and only if the distance from z to 0 is 0 , and the latter happens if and only if z = 0 , which is what we were asked to show.5

For the third property, we note that since a = Re ( z ) and b = Im ( z ) , z = a 2 + b 2 = Re ( z ) 2 + Im ( z ) 2 .

To prove the product rule, suppose z = a + b i and w = c + d i for real numbers a , b , c and d . Then z w = ( a + b i ) ( c + d i ) . After the usual arithmetic6 we get z w = ( a c b d ) + ( a d + b c ) i . Therefore,

| z w | = ( a c b d ) 2 + ( a d + b c ) 2 = a 2 c 2 2 a b c d + b 2 d 2 + a 2 d 2 + 2 a b c d + b 2 c 2 Expand = a 2 c 2 + a 2 d 2 + b 2 c 2 + b 2 d 2 Rearrange terms = a 2 ( c 2 + d 2 ) + b 2 ( c 2 + d 2 ) Factor = ( a 2 + b 2 ) ( c 2 + d 2 ) Factor = a 2 + b 2 c 2 + d 2 Product Rule for Radicals = | z | | w | Definition of  | z |  and  | w |

Hence | z w | = | z | | w | as required.

Now that the Product Rule has been established, we use it and the Principle of Mathematical Induction7 to prove the power rule. Let P ( n ) be the statement | z n | = | z | n . Then P ( 1 ) is true since | z 1 | = | z | = | z | 1 .

Next, assume P ( k ) is true. That is, assume | z k | = | z | k for some k 1 . Our job is to show that P ( k + 1 ) is true, namely | z k + 1 | = | z | k + 1 . As is customary with induction proofs, we first try to reduce the problem in such a way as to use the Induction Hypothesis.

| z k + 1 | = | z k z | Properties of Exponents = | z k | | z | Product Rule = | z | k | z | Induction Hypothesis = | z | k + 1 Properties of Exponents

Hence, P ( k + 1 ) is true, which means | z n | = | z | n is true for all natural numbers n .

Like the Power Rule, the Quotient Rule can also be established with the help of the Product Rule. We assume w 0 (so | w | 0 ) and we get

| z w | = | ( z ) ( 1 w ) | = | z | | 1 w | Product Rule.

Hence, the proof really boils down to showing | 1 w | = 1 | w | . This is left as an exercise.

Next, we characterize the argument of a complex number in terms of its real and imaginary parts.

To prove Theorem 14.4, suppose z = a + b i for real numbers a and b . By definition, a = Re ( z ) and b = Im ( z ) , so the point associated with z is ( a , b ) = ( Re ( z ) , Im ( z ) ) . From Section 14.1, we know that if ( r , θ ) is a polar representation for ( Re ( z ) , Im ( z ) ) , then tan ( θ ) = Im ( z ) Re ( z ) , provided Re ( z ) 0 .

If Re ( z ) = 0 and Im ( z ) > 0 , then z lies on the positive imaginary axis. Since we take r > 0 , we have that θ is coterminal with π 2 , and the result follows. If Re ( z ) = 0 and Im ( z ) < 0 , then z lies on the negative imaginary axis, and a similar argument shows θ is coterminal with π 2 .

The last property in the theorem was already discussed in the remarks following Definition 14.1.

Our next goal is to completely marry the Geometry and the Algebra of the complex numbers. To that end, consider the figure below.

Coordinate-plane figure.
Figure 14.175

Polar coordinates, ( r , θ ) associated with z = a + b i with r 0 .

We know from Theorem 14.1 that a = r cos ( θ ) and b = r sin ( θ ) . Making these substitutions for a and b gives z = a + b i = r cos ( θ ) + r sin ( θ ) i = r [ cos ( θ ) + i sin ( θ ) ] .

The expression ` cos ( θ ) + i sin ( θ ) ' is abbreviated cis ( θ ) so we can write z = r cis ( θ ) = | z | cis ( θ ) .

Since there are infinitely many choices for θ arg ( z ) , there infinitely many polar forms for z , so we used the indefinite article `a' in Definition 14.2. It is time for an example.

The following theorem summarizes the advantages of working with complex numbers in polar form.

The proof of Theorem 14.5 requires a healthy mix of definition, arithmetic and identities. We first start with the product rule.

z w = [ | z | cis ( α ) ] [ | w | cis ( β ) ] = | z | | w | [ cos ( α ) + i sin ( α ) ] [ cos ( β ) + i sin ( β ) ]

We now focus on the quantity in brackets on the right hand side of the equation.

[ cos ( α ) + i sin ( α ) ] [ cos ( β ) + i sin ( β ) ] = cos ( α ) cos ( β ) + i cos ( α ) sin ( β ) + i sin ( α ) cos ( β ) + i 2 sin ( α ) sin ( β ) = cos ( α ) cos ( β ) + i 2 sin ( α ) sin ( β ) Rearranging terms + i sin ( α ) cos ( β ) + i cos ( α ) sin ( β ) = ( cos ( α ) cos ( β ) sin ( α ) sin ( β ) ) Since  i 2 = 1 + i ( sin ( α ) cos ( β ) + cos ( α ) sin ( β ) ) Factor out  i = cos ( α + β ) + i sin ( α + β ) Sum identities = cis ( α + β ) Definition of ‘cis’

Putting this together with our earlier work, we get z w = | z | | w | cis ( α + β ) , as required.

Next take aim at the Power Rule, better known as DeMoivre's Theorem.8 We proceed by induction on n . Let P ( n ) be the sentence z n = | z | n cis ( n θ ) . Then P ( 1 ) is true, since z 1 = z = | z | cis ( θ ) = | z | 1 cis ( 1 θ ) .

We now assume P ( k ) is true, that is, we assume z k = | z | k cis ( k θ ) for some k 1 . Our goal is to show that P ( k + 1 ) is true, or that z k + 1 = | z | k + 1 cis ( ( k + 1 ) θ ) . We have

z k + 1 = z k z Properties of Exponents = ( | z | k cis ( k θ ) ) ( | z | cis ( θ ) ) Induction Hypothesis = ( | z | k | z | ) cis ( k θ + θ ) Product Rule = | z | k + 1 cis ( ( k + 1 ) θ )

Hence, assuming P ( k ) is true, we have that P ( k + 1 ) is true, so by the Principle of Mathematical Induction, z n = | z | n cis ( n θ ) for all natural numbers n .

The last property in Theorem 14.5 to prove is the quotient rule. Assuming | w | 0 we have

z w = | z | cis ( α ) | w | cis ( β ) = ( | z | | w | ) cos ( α ) + i sin ( α ) cos ( β ) + i sin ( β )

Next, we multiply both the numerator and denominator of the right hand side by ( cos ( β ) i sin ( β ) ) which is the complex conjugate of ( cos ( β ) + i sin ( β ) ) to get

z w = ( | z | | w | ) cos ( α ) + i sin ( α ) cos ( β ) + i sin ( β ) cos ( β ) i sin ( β ) cos ( β ) i sin ( β )

If we let the numerator be N = [ cos ( α ) + i sin ( α ) ] [ cos ( β ) i sin ( β ) ] and simplify we get

N = [ cos ( α ) + i sin ( α ) ] [ cos ( β ) i sin ( β ) ] = cos ( α ) cos ( β ) i cos ( α ) sin ( β ) + i sin ( α ) cos ( β ) i 2 sin ( α ) sin ( β ) Expand = [ cos ( α ) cos ( β ) + sin ( α ) sin ( β ) ] + i [ sin ( α ) cos ( β ) cos ( α ) sin ( β ) ] Rearrange and Factor = cos ( α β ) + i sin ( α β ) Difference Identities = cis ( α β ) Definition of ‘cis’

If we call the denominator D then we get

D = [ cos ( β ) + i sin ( β ) ] [ cos ( β ) i sin ( β ) ] = cos 2 ( β ) i cos ( β ) sin ( β ) + i cos ( β ) sin ( β ) i 2 sin 2 ( β ) Expand = cos 2 ( β ) i 2 sin 2 ( β ) Simplify = cos 2 ( β ) + sin 2 ( β ) Again,  i 2 = 1 = 1 Pythagorean Identity

Putting it all together, we get

z w = ( | z | | w | ) cos ( α ) + i sin ( α ) cos ( β ) + i sin ( β ) cos ( β ) i sin ( β ) cos ( β ) i sin ( β ) = ( | z | | w | ) cis ( α β ) 1 = | z | | w | cis ( α β )

and we are done. The next example makes good use of Theorem 14.5.

Some remarks are in order. First, the reader may not be sold on using the polar form of complex numbers to multiply complex numbers – especially if they aren't given in polar form to begin with.

Indeed, a lot of work was needed to convert the numbers z and w in Example 14.3.3 into polar form, compute their product, and convert back to rectangular form – certainly more work than is required to multiply out z w = ( 2 3 + 2 i ) ( 1 + i 3 ) the old-fashioned way.

However, Theorem 14.5 pays huge dividends when computing powers of complex numbers. Consider how we computed w 5 above and compare that to using the Binomial Theorem, Theorem 10.7, to accomplish the same feat by expanding ( 1 + i 3 ) 5 .

Moreover, division is tricky in the best of times, and we saved ourselves a lot of time and effort using Theorem 14.5 to find and simplify z w using their polar forms as opposed to starting with 2 3 + 2 i 1 + i 3 , rationalizing the denominator, and so forth.

There is geometric reason for studying these polar forms and we would be derelict in our duties if we did not mention the Geometry hidden in Theorem 14.5.

Take the product rule, for instance. If z = | z | cis ( α ) and w = | w | cis ( β ) , the formula z w = | z | | w | cis ( α + β ) can be viewed geometrically as a two step process.

The multiplication of | z | by | w | can be interpreted as magnifying9 the distance | z | from z to 0 , by the factor | w | . Adding the argument of w to the argument of z can be interpreted geometrically as a rotation of β radians counter-clockwise.10

Focusing on z and w from Example 14.3.3, we can arrive at the product z w by plotting z , doubling its distance from 0 (since | w | = 2 ), and rotating 2 π 3 radians counter-clockwise. The sequence of diagrams below attempts to describe this process geometrically.

Coordinate-plane figure.
Figure 14.176
Coordinate-plane figure.
Figure 14.177

Multiplying z by | w | = 2 .

Rotating counter-clockwise by Arg ( w ) = 2 π 3 radians.

Visualizing z w for z = 4 cis ( π 6 ) and w = 2 cis ( 2 π 3 ) .

We may also visualize division similarly. Here, the formula z w = | z | | w | cis ( α β ) may be interpreted as shrinking11 the distance from 0 to z by the factor | w | , followed up by a clockwise 12 rotation of β radians.

In the case of z and w from Example 14.3.3, we arrive at z w by first halving the distance from 0 to z , then rotating clockwise 2 π 3 radians as shown below.

Coordinate-plane figure.
Figure 14.178
Coordinate-plane figure.
Figure 14.179

Dividing z by | w | = 2 .

Rotating clockwise by Arg ( w ) = 2 π 3 radians.

Visualizing z w for z = 4 cis ( π 6 ) and w = 2 cis ( 2 π 3 ) .

Our last goal of the section is to reverse DeMoivre's Theorem to extract roots of complex numbers.

Unlike Definition A.8 in Section A.2, we do not specify one particular prinicpal n th root, hence the use of the indefinite article `an' as in `an n th root of z '. Using this definition, both 4 and 4 are square roots of 16 , while 16 means the principal square root of 16 as in 16 = 4 .

Suppose we wish to find all complex third (cube) roots of 8 . Algebraically, we are trying to solve w 3 = 8 . We know that there is only one real solution to this equation, namely w = 8 3 = 2 , but if we take the time to rewrite this equation as w 3 8 = 0 and factor, we get ( w 2 ) ( w 2 + 2 w + 4 ) = 0 .

Solving w 2 + 2 w + 4 = 0 gives two more cube roots w = 1 ± i 3 , for a total of three cube roots of 8 . Per Theorem 2.16, since the degree of p ( w ) = w 3 8 is three, there are three complex zeros, counting multiplicity. Since we have found three distinct zeros, we know we have found all of the zeros, so there are exactly three distinct cube roots of 8 .

Let us now solve this same problem using the machinery developed in this section. To do so, we express z = 8 in polar form. Since z = 8 lies 8 units away on the positive real axis, we get z = 8 cis ( 0 ) . If we let w = | w | cis ( α ) be a polar form of w , the equation w 3 = 8 becomes

w 3 = 8 ( | w | cis ( α ) ) 3 = 8 cis ( 0 ) | w | 3 cis ( 3 α ) = 8 cis ( 0 ) DeMoivre’s Theorem

The complex number on the left hand side of the equation corresponds to the point with polar coordinates ( | w | 3 , 3 α ) , while the complex number on the right hand side corresponds to the point with polar coordinates ( 8 , 0 ) . Since | w | 0 , so is | w | 3 , which means ( | w | 3 , 3 α ) and ( 8 , 0 ) are two polar representations corresponding to the same complex number, both with positive r values.

From Section 14.1, we know | w | 3 = 8 and 3 α = 0 + 2 π k for integers k . Since | w | is a real number, we solve | w | 3 = 8 by extracting the principal cube root to get | w | = 8 3 = 2 .

As for α , we get α = 2 π k 3 for integers k . This produces three distinct points with polar coordinates corresponding to k = 0 , 1 and 2 : specifically ( 2 , 0 ) , ( 2 , 2 π 3 ) and ( 2 , 4 π 3 ) .

The point ( 2 , 0 ) corresponds to the complex number w 0 = 2 cis ( 0 ) , the point ( 2 , 2 π 3 ) corresponds to the complex number w 1 = 2 cis ( 2 π 3 ) , and the point ( 2 , 4 π 3 ) corresponds to the complex number w 2 = 2 cis ( 4 π 3 ) . Converting to rectangular form, we find w 0 = 2 , w 1 = 1 + i 3 and w 2 = 1 i 3 .

While this process seems a tad more involved than our previous factoring approach, this procedure can be generalized to find, for example, all of the fifth roots of 32 . (Try using Chapter 2 techniques on that!)

If we start with a generic complex number in polar form z = | z | cis ( θ ) and solve w n = z in the same manner as above, we arrive at the following theorem.

The proof of Theorem 14.6 breaks into to two parts: first, showing that each w k is an n th root, and second, showing that the set { w k | k = 0 , 1 , , ( n 1 ) } consists of n different complex numbers.

To show w k is an n th root of z , we use DeMoivre's Theorem to show ( w k ) n = z .

( w k ) n = ( r n cis ( θ n + 2 π n k ) ) n = ( r n ) n cis ( n [ θ n + 2 π n k ] ) DeMoivre’s Theorem = r cis ( θ + 2 π k )

Since k is a whole number, cos ( θ + 2 π k ) = cos ( θ ) and sin ( θ + 2 π k ) = sin ( θ ) . Hence, it follows that cis ( θ + 2 π k ) = cis ( θ ) , so ( w k ) n = r cis ( θ ) = z , as required.

To show that the formula in Theorem 14.6 generates n distinct numbers, we assume n 2 (or else there is nothing to prove) and note that the modulus of each of the w k is the same, namely r n .

Therefore, the only way any two of these polar forms correspond to the same number is if their arguments are coterminal – that is, if the arguments differ by an integer multiple of 2 π .

Suppose k and j are whole numbers between 0 and ( n 1 ) , inclusive, with k j . Since k and j are different, let's assume for the sake of argument that k > j . Then ( θ n + 2 π n k ) ( θ n + 2 π n j ) = 2 π ( k j n ) .

For 2 π ( k j n ) to be an integer multiple of 2 π , ( k j ) must be a multiple of n . But because of the restrictions on k and j , 0 < k j n 1 . (Think this through.) Hence, ( k j ) is a positive number less than n , so it cannot be a multiple of n .

As a result, w k and w j are different complex numbers, and we are done. By Theorem 2.16, we know there at most n distinct solutions to w n = z , and we have just found all n of them.

We illustrate Theorem 14.6 in the next example.

Having done some computations with Theorem 14.6, it's time to take a step back to look at things geometrically.

Essentially, Theorem 14.6 says that to find the n th roots of a complex number, we first take the n th root of the modulus and divide the argument by n . This gives the first root w 0 .

Each successive root is found by adding 2 π n to the argument, which amounts to rotating w 0 by 2 π n radians. The result of these actions produces n roots, spaced equally around the complex plane.

As an example of this, we plot our answers to number in Example 14.3.4 below.

Coordinate-plane figure.
Figure 14.180

The four fourth roots of z = 16 equally spaced 2 π 4 = π 2 around the plane.

We have only glimpsed at the beauty of the complex numbers in this section. The complex plane is without a doubt one of the most important mathematical constructs ever devised. Coupled with Calculus, it is the venue for incredibly important Science and Engineering applications.13

Exercises

In Exercises -, find a polar representation for the complex number z . Identify Re ( z ) , Im ( z ) , | z | , arg ( z ) and Arg ( z ) .

  1. z = 9 + 9 i
  2. z = 5 + 5 i 3
  3. z = 6 i
  4. z = 3 2 + 3 i 2
  5. z = 6 3 + 6 i
  6. z = 2
  7. z = 3 2 1 2 i
  8. z = 3 3 i
  9. z = 5 i
  10. z = 2 2 2 i 2
  11. z = 6
  12. z = i 7 3
  13. z = 3 + 4 i
  14. z = 2 + i
  15. z = 7 + 24 i
  16. z = 2 + 6 i
  17. z = 12 5 i
  18. z = 5 2 i
  19. z = 4 2 i
  20. z = 1 3 i

In Exercises -, find the rectangular form of the given complex number. Use whatever identities are necessary to find the exact values.

  1. z = 6 cis ( 0 )
  2. z = 2 cis ( π 6 )
  3. z = 7 2 cis ( π 4 )
  4. z = 3 cis ( π 2 )
  5. z = 4 cis ( 2 π 3 )
  6. z = 6 cis ( 3 π 4 )
  7. z = 9 cis ( π )
  8. z = 3 cis ( 4 π 3 )
  9. z = 7 cis ( 3 π 4 )
  10. z = 13 cis ( 3 π 2 )
  11. z = 1 2 cis ( 7 π 4 )
  12. z = 12 cis ( π 3 )
  13. z = 8 cis ( π 12 )
  14. z = 2 cis ( 7 π 8 )
  15. z = 5 cis ( arctan ( 4 3 ) )
  16. z = 10 cis ( arctan ( 1 3 ) )
  17. z = 15 cis ( arctan ( 2 ) )
  18. z = 3 ( arctan ( 2 ) )
  19. z = 50 cis ( π arctan ( 7 24 ) )
  20. z = 1 2 cis ( π + arctan ( 5 12 ) )

For Exercises -, use z = 3 3 2 + 3 2 i and w = 3 2 3 i 2 to compute the quantity. Express your answers in polar form using the principal argument.

  1. z w
  2. z w
  3. w z
  4. z 4
  5. w 3
  6. z 5 w 2
  7. z 3 w 2
  8. z 2 w
  9. w z 2
  10. z 3 w 2
  11. w 2 z 3
  12. ( w z ) 6

In Exercises -, use DeMoivre's Theorem to find the indicated power of the given complex number. Express your final answers in rectangular form.

  1. ( 2 + 2 i 3 ) 3
  2. ( 3 i ) 3
  3. ( 3 + 3 i ) 4
  4. ( 3 + i ) 4
  5. ( 5 2 + 5 2 i ) 3
  6. ( 1 2 3 2 i ) 6
  7. ( 3 2 3 2 i ) 3
  8. ( 3 3 1 3 i ) 4
  9. ( 2 2 + 2 2 i ) 4
  10. ( 2 + 2 i ) 5
  11. ( 3 i ) 5
  12. ( 1 i ) 8

In Exercises -, find the indicated complex roots. Express your answers in polar form and then convert them into rectangular form.

  1. the two square roots of z = 4 i
  2. the two square roots of z = 25 i
  3. the two square roots of z = 1 + i 3
  4. the two square roots of 5 2 5 3 2 i
  5. the three cube roots of z = 64
  6. the three cube roots of z = 125
  7. the three cube roots of z = i
  8. the three cube roots of z = 8 i
  9. the four fourth roots of z = 16
  10. the four fourth roots of z = 81
  11. the six sixth roots of z = 64
  12. the six sixth roots of z = 729
  13. Use the Sum and Difference Identities in Theorem 12.8 or the Half Angle Identities in Theorem 12.11 to convert the three cube roots of z = 2 + i 2 we found in Example 14.3.4, number from polar form to rectangular form.
  14. Use a calculator to approximate the rectangular form of the five fifth roots of 1 we found in Example 14.3.4, number.
  15. According to Theorem 2.18 in Section 2.4, the polynomial p ( x ) = x 4 + 4 can be factored into the product linear and irreducible quadratic factors. In Exercise in Section 9.7, we showed you how to factor this polynomial into the product of two irreducible quadratic factors using a system of non-linear equations. Now that we can compute the complex fourth roots of 4 directly using Theorem 14.6, we can apply the Complex Factorization Theorem, Theorem 2.16, to obtain the linear factorization p ( x ) = ( x ( 1 + i ) ) ( x ( 1 i ) ) ( x ( 1 + i ) ) ( x ( 1 i ) ) . By multiplying the first two factors together and then the second two factors together, thus pairing up the complex conjugate pairs of zeros Theorem 2.17 told us we'd get, we have that p ( x ) = ( x 2 2 x + 2 ) ( x 2 + 2 x + 2 ) . Use the 12 complex 12 th roots of 4096 to factor p ( x ) = x 12 4096 into a product of linear and irreducible quadratic factors.
  16. Use Exercise from Section 13.4 to show the the Triangle Inequality | z + w | | z | + | w | holds for all complex numbers z and w as well. Identify the complex number z = a + b i with the vector u = a , b and identify the complex number w = c + d i with the vector v = c , d and just follow your nose!
  17. Complete the proof of Theorem 14.3 by showing that if w 0 than | 1 w | = 1 | w | .
  18. Recall from Section 2.4 that given a complex number z = a + b i its complex conjugate, denoted z ¯ , is given by z ¯ = a b i .

    1. Prove that | z ¯ | = | z | .
    2. Prove that | z | = z z ¯
    3. Show that Re ( z ) = z + z ¯ 2 and Im ( z ) = z z ¯ 2 i
    4. Show that if θ arg ( z ) then θ arg ( z ¯ ) . Interpret this result geometrically.
    5. Is it always true that Arg ( z ¯ ) = Arg ( z ) ?
  19. Given a natural number n 2 , the n complex n th roots of z = 1 are called the n th Roots of Unity. In the following exercises, assume that n is a fixed, but arbitrary, natural number such that n 2 .

    1. Show that w = 1 is an n th root of unity.
    2. Show that if both w j and w k are n th roots of unity then so is their product w j w k .
    3. Show that if w j is an n th root of unity then there is an n th root of unity w j so that w j w j = 1 .

      HINT: If w j = cis ( θ ) let w j = cis ( 2 π θ ) . Show w j = cis ( 2 π θ ) is indeed an n th root of unity.

  20. Another way to express the polar form of a complex number is to use the exponential function. For real numbers t , Euler 's Formula defines e i t = cos ( t ) + i sin ( t ) .

    1. Use Theorem 14.5 to show that:

      1. e i x e i y = e i ( x + y ) for all real numbers x and y .
      2. ( e i x ) n = e i ( n x ) for any real number x and any natural number n .
      3. e i x e i y = e i ( x y ) for all real numbers x and y .
    2. If z = r cis ( θ ) is the polar form of z , show that z = r e i t where θ = t radians.
    3. Show that e i π + 1 = 0 . (This famous equation relates the five most important constants in all of Mathematics with the three most fundamental operations in Mathematics.)
    4. Show that cos ( t ) = e i t + e i t 2 and that sin ( t ) = e i t e i t 2 i for all real numbers t .

Answers

  1. z = 9 + 9 i = 9 2 cis ( π 4 ) , Re ( z ) = 9 , Im ( z ) = 9 , | z | = 9 2

    arg ( z ) = { π 4 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π 4 .

  2. z = 5 + 5 i 3 = 10 cis ( π 3 ) , Re ( z ) = 5 , Im ( z ) = 5 3 , | z | = 10

    arg ( z ) = { π 3 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π 3 .

  3. z = 6 i = 6 cis ( π 2 ) , Re ( z ) = 0 , Im ( z ) = 6 , | z | = 6

    arg ( z ) = { π 2 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π 2 .

  4. z = 3 2 + 3 i 2 = 6 cis ( 3 π 4 ) , Re ( z ) = 3 2 , Im ( z ) = 3 2 , | z | = 6

    arg ( z ) = { 3 π 4 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = 3 π 4 .

  5. z = 6 3 + 6 i = 12 cis ( 5 π 6 ) , Re ( z ) = 6 3 , Im ( z ) = 6 , | z | = 12

    arg ( z ) = { 5 π 6 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = 5 π 6 .

  6. z = 2 = 2 cis ( π ) , Re ( z ) = 2 , Im ( z ) = 0 , | z | = 2

    arg ( z ) = { ( 2 k + 1 ) π | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π .

  7. z = 3 2 1 2 i = cis ( 7 π 6 ) , Re ( z ) = 3 2 , Im ( z ) = 1 2 , | z | = 1

    arg ( z ) = { 7 π 6 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = 5 π 6 .

  8. z = 3 3 i = 3 2 cis ( 5 π 4 ) , Re ( z ) = 3 , Im ( z ) = 3 , | z | = 3 2

    arg ( z ) = { 5 π 4 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = 3 π 4 .

  9. z = 5 i = 5 cis ( 3 π 2 ) , Re ( z ) = 0 , Im ( z ) = 5 , | z | = 5

    arg ( z ) = { 3 π 2 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π 2 .

  10. z = 2 2 2 i 2 = 4 cis ( 7 π 4 ) , Re ( z ) = 2 2 , Im ( z ) = 2 2 , | z | = 4

    arg ( z ) = { 7 π 4 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π 4 .

  11. z = 6 = 6 cis ( 0 ) , Re ( z ) = 6 , Im ( z ) = 0 , | z | = 6

    arg ( z ) = { 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = 0 .

  12. z = i 7 3 = 7 3 cis ( π 2 ) , Re ( z ) = 0 , Im ( z ) = 7 3 , | z | = 7 3

    arg ( z ) = { π 2 + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π 2 .

  13. z = 3 + 4 i = 5 cis ( arctan ( 4 3 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 3 , Im ( z ) = 4 , | z | = 5

    arg ( z ) = { arctan ( 4 3 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = arctan ( 4 3 ) .

  14. z = 2 + i = 3 cis ( arctan ( 2 2 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 2 , Im ( z ) = 1 , | z | = 3

    arg ( z ) = { arctan ( 2 2 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = arctan ( 2 2 ) .

  15. z = 7 + 24 i = 25 cis ( π arctan ( 24 7 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 7 , Im ( z ) = 24 , | z | = 25

    arg ( z ) = { π arctan ( 24 7 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π arctan ( 24 7 ) .

  16. z = 2 + 6 i = 2 10 cis ( π arctan ( 3 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 2 , Im ( z ) = 6 , | z | = 2 10

    arg ( z ) = { π arctan ( 3 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = π arctan ( 3 ) .

  17. z = 12 5 i = 13 cis ( π + arctan ( 5 12 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 12 , Im ( z ) = 5 , | z | = 13

    arg ( z ) = { π + arctan ( 5 12 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = arctan ( 5 12 ) π .

  18. z = 5 2 i = 29 cis ( π + arctan ( 2 5 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 5 , Im ( z ) = 2 , | z | = 29

    arg ( z ) = { π + arctan ( 2 5 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = arctan ( 2 5 ) π .

  19. z = 4 2 i = 2 5 cis ( arctan ( 1 2 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 4 , Im ( z ) = 2 , | z | = 2 5

    arg ( z ) = { arctan ( 1 2 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = arctan ( 1 2 ) = arctan ( 1 2 ) .

  20. z = 1 3 i = 10 cis ( arctan ( 3 ) ) , Re ( z ) = 1 , Im ( z ) = 3 , | z | = 10

    arg ( z ) = { arctan ( 3 ) + 2 π k | k  is an integer } and Arg ( z ) = arctan ( 3 ) = arctan ( 3 ) .

  21. z = 6 cis ( 0 ) = 6
  22. z = 2 cis ( π 6 ) = 3 + i
  23. z = 7 2 cis ( π 4 ) = 7 + 7 i
  24. z = 3 cis ( π 2 ) = 3 i
  25. z = 4 cis ( 2 π 3 ) = 2 + 2 i 3
  26. z = 6 cis ( 3 π 4 ) = 3 + i 3
  27. z = 9 cis ( π ) = 9
  28. z = 3 cis ( 4 π 3 ) = 3 2 3 i 3 2
  29. z = 7 cis ( 3 π 4 ) = 7 2 2 7 2 2 i
  30. z = 13 cis ( 3 π 2 ) = i 13
  31. z = 1 2 cis ( 7 π 4 ) = 2 4 i 2 4
  32. z = 12 cis ( π 3 ) = 6 6 i 3
  33. z = 8 cis ( π 12 ) = 4 2 + 3 + 4 i 2 3
  34. z = 2 cis ( 7 π 8 ) = 2 + 2 + i 2 2
  35. z = 5 cis ( arctan ( 4 3 ) ) = 3 + 4 i
  36. z = 10 cis ( arctan ( 1 3 ) ) = 3 + i
  37. z = 15 cis ( arctan ( 2 ) ) = 3 5 6 i 5
  38. z = 3 cis ( arctan ( 2 ) ) = 1 i 2
  39. z = 50 cis ( π arctan ( 7 24 ) ) = 48 + 14 i
  40. z = 1 2 cis ( π + arctan ( 5 12 ) ) = 6 13 5 i 26

In Exercises -, we have that z = 3 3 2 + 3 2 i = 3 cis ( 5 π 6 ) and w = 3 2 3 i 2 = 6 cis ( π 4 ) so we get the following.

  1. z w = 18 cis ( 7 π 12 )
  2. z w = 1 2 cis ( 11 π 12 )
  3. w z = 2 cis ( 11 π 12 )
  4. z 4 = 81 cis ( 2 π 3 )
  5. w 3 = 216 cis ( 3 π 4 )
  6. z 5 w 2 = 8748 cis ( π 3 )
  7. z 3 w 2 = 972 cis ( 0 )
  8. z 2 w = 3 2 cis ( π 12 )
  9. w z 2 = 2 3 cis ( π 12 )
  10. z 3 w 2 = 3 4 cis ( π )
  11. w 2 z 3 = 4 3 cis ( π )
  12. ( w z ) 6 = 64 cis ( π 2 )
  13. ( 2 + 2 i 3 ) 3 = 64
  14. ( 3 i ) 3 = 8 i
  15. ( 3 + 3 i ) 4 = 324
  16. ( 3 + i ) 4 = 8 + 8 i 3
  17. ( 5 2 + 5 2 i ) 3 = 125 4 + 125 4 i
  18. ( 1 2 i 3 2 ) 6 = 1
  19. ( 3 2 3 2 i ) 3 = 27 4 27 4 i
  20. ( 3 3 1 3 i ) 4 = 8 81 8 i 3 81
  21. ( 2 2 + 2 2 i ) 4 = 1
  22. ( 2 + 2 i ) 5 = 128 128 i
  23. ( 3 i ) 5 = 16 3 16 i
  24. ( 1 i ) 8 = 16
  25. Since z = 4 i = 4 cis ( π 2 ) we have

    w 0 = 2 cis ( π 4 ) = 2 + i 2

    w 1 = 2 cis ( 5 π 4 ) = 2 i 2

  26. Since z = 25 i = 25 cis ( 3 π 2 ) we have

    w 0 = 5 cis ( 3 π 4 ) = 5 2 2 + 5 2 2 i

    w 1 = 5 cis ( 7 π 4 ) = 5 2 2 5 2 2 i

  27. Since z = 1 + i 3 = 2 cis ( π 3 ) we have

    w 0 = 2 cis ( π 6 ) = 6 2 + 2 2 i

    w 1 = 2 cis ( 7 π 6 ) = 6 2 2 2 i

  28. Since z = 5 2 5 3 2 i = 5 cis ( 5 π 3 ) we have

    w 0 = 5 cis ( 5 π 6 ) = 15 2 + 5 2 i

    w 1 = 5 cis ( 11 π 6 ) = 15 2 5 2 i

  29. Since z = 64 = 64 cis ( 0 ) we have

    w 0 = 4 cis ( 0 ) = 4

    w 1 = 4 cis ( 2 π 3 ) = 2 + 2 i 3

    w 2 = 4 cis ( 4 π 3 ) = 2 2 i 3

  30. Since z = 125 = 125 cis ( π ) we have

    w 0 = 5 cis ( π 3 ) = 5 2 + 5 3 2 i

    w 1 = 5 cis ( π ) = 5

    w 2 = 5 cis ( 5 π 3 ) = 5 2 5 3 2 i

  31. Since z = i = cis ( π 2 ) we have

    w 0 = cis ( π 6 ) = 3 2 + 1 2 i

    w 1 = cis ( 5 π 6 ) = 3 2 + 1 2 i

    w 2 = cis ( 3 π 2 ) = i

  32. Since z = 8 i = 8 cis ( 3 π 2 ) we have

    w 0 = 2 cis ( π 2 ) = 2 i

    w 1 = 2 cis ( 7 π 6 ) = 3 i

    w 2 = cis ( 11 π 6 ) = 3 i

  33. Since z = 16 = 16 cis ( 0 ) we have

    w 0 = 2 cis ( 0 ) = 2

    w 1 = 2 cis ( π 2 ) = 2 i

    w 2 = 2 cis ( π ) = 2

    w 3 = 2 cis ( 3 π 2 ) = 2 i

  34. Since z = 81 = 81 cis ( π ) we have

    w 0 = 3 cis ( π 4 ) = 3 2 2 + 3 2 2 i

    w 1 = 3 cis ( 3 π 4 ) = 3 2 2 + 3 2 2 i

    w 2 = 3 cis ( 5 π 4 ) = 3 2 2 3 2 2 i

    w 3 = 3 cis ( 7 π 4 ) = 3 2 2 3 2 2 i

  35. Since z = 64 = 64 cis ( 0 ) we have

    w 0 = 2 cis ( 0 ) = 2

    w 1 = 2 cis ( π 3 ) = 1 + 3 i

    w 2 = 2 cis ( 2 π 3 ) = 1 + 3 i

    w 3 = 2 cis ( π ) = 2

    w 4 = 2 cis ( 2 π 3 ) = 1 3 i

    w 5 = 2 cis ( π 3 ) = 1 3 i

  36. Since z = 729 = 729 cis ( π ) we have

    w 0 = 3 cis ( π 6 ) = 3 3 2 + 3 2 i

    w 1 = 3 cis ( π 2 ) = 3 i

    w 2 = 3 cis ( 5 π 6 ) = 3 3 2 + 3 2 i

    w 3 = 3 cis ( 7 π 6 ) = 3 3 2 3 2 i

    w 4 = 3 cis ( 3 π 2 ) = 3 i

    w 5 = 3 cis ( 11 π 6 ) = 3 3 2 3 2 i

  37. Note: In the answers for w 0 and w 2 the first rectangular form comes from applying the appropriate Sum or Difference Identity ( π 12 = π 3 π 4 and 17 π 12 = 2 π 3 + 3 π 4 , respectively) and the second comes from using the Half-Angle Identities.

    w 0 = 2 3 cis ( π 12 ) = 2 3 ( 6 + 2 4 + i ( 6 2 4 ) ) = 2 3 ( 2 + 3 2 + i 2 3 2 )

    w 1 = 2 3 cis ( 3 π 4 ) = 2 3 ( 2 2 + 2 2 i )

    w 2 = 2 3 cis ( 17 π 12 ) = 2 3 ( 2 6 4 + i ( 2 6 4 ) ) = 2 3 ( 2 3 2 + i 2 + 3 2 )

  38. w 0 = cis ( 0 ) = 1

    w 1 = cis ( 2 π 5 ) 0.309 + 0.951 i

    w 2 = cis ( 4 π 5 ) 0.809 + 0.588 i

    w 3 = cis ( 6 π 5 ) 0.809 0.588 i

    w 4 = cis ( 8 π 5 ) 0.309 0.951 i

  39. p ( x ) = x 12 4096 = ( x 2 ) ( x + 2 ) ( x 2 + 4 ) ( x 2 2 x + 4 ) ( x 2 + 2 x + 4 ) ( x 2 2 3 x + 4 ) ( x 2 + 2 3 + 4 )

Adapted from Precalculus, Preliminary 4th Edition (integrated calculus), by Carl Stitz and Jeff Zeager (stitz-zeager.com), licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Changes were made: reformatted as an accessible XYZ web edition. License: CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0.

These eBooks are a prerelease and are not yet certified conformant with WCAG 2.1 AA or ADA Title II. Every page is built against an automated accessibility gate, and the published editions will meet ADA Title II requirements when they release in late September 2026. If something is unusable, please tell us.