8.6 Partial Fraction Decomposition
This section uses systems of linear equations to rewrite rational functions in a form more palatable to Calculus students. In College Algebra, the function
is written in the best form possible to construct a sign diagram and to find zeros and asymptotes, but certain applications in Calculus require us to rewrite as
If we are given the form of in, it is a matter of Intermediate Algebra to determine a common denominator to obtain the form of given. The focus of this section is to develop a method by which we start with in the form of and `resolve it into partial fractions' to obtain the form in. Essentially, we need to reverse the least common denominator process. Starting with the form of in, we begin by factoring the denominator
We now think about which individual denominators could contribute to obtain as the least common denominator. Certainly and , but are there any other factors? Since is an irreducible quadratic1 there are no factors of it that have real coefficients which can contribute to the denominator. The factor , however, is not irreducible, since we can think of it as , a so-called `repeated' linear factor.2 This means it's possible that a term with a denominator of just contributed to the expression as well. What about something like ? This, too, could contribute, but we would then wish to break down that denominator into and , so we leave out a term of that form. At this stage, we have guessed
Our next task is to determine what form the unknown numerators take. It stands to reason that since the expression is `proper' in the sense that the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator, we are safe to make the ansatz that all of the partial fraction resolvents are also. This means that the numerator of the fraction with as its denominator is just a constant and the numerators on the terms involving the denominators and are at most linear polynomials. That is, we guess that there are real numbers , , , and so that
However, if we look more closely at the term , we see that . The term has the same form as the term which means it contributes nothing new to our expansion. Hence, we drop it and, after re-labeling, we find ourselves with our new guess:
Our next task is to determine the values of our unknowns. Clearing denominators gives
Gathering the like powers of we have
In order for this to hold for all values of in the domain of , we equate the coefficients of corresponding powers of on each side of the equation3 and obtain the system of linear equations
To solve this system of equations, we could use any of the methods presented in Sections through, but none of these methods are as efficient as the good old-fashioned substitution you learned in Intermediate Algebra. From , we have and we substitute this into to get . Similarly, since gives us , we have from that . We get
which matches the formula given. As we have seen in this opening example, resolving a rational function into partial fractions takes two steps: first, we need to determine the form of the decomposition, and then we need to determine the unknown coefficients which appear in said form. Theorem guarantees that any polynomial with real coefficients can be factored over the real numbers as a product of linear factors and irreducible quadratic factors. Once we have this factorization of the denominator of a rational function, the next theorem tells us the form the decomposition takes. The reader is encouraged to review the Factor Theorem (Theorem ) and its connection to the role of multiplicity to fully appreciate the statement of the following theorem.
The proof of Theorem is best left to a course in Abstract Algebra. Notice that the theorem provides for the general case, so we need to use subscripts, , , etc., to denote different unknown coefficients as opposed to the usual convention of , , etc.. The stress on multiplicities is to help us correctly group factors in the denominator. For example, consider the rational function
Factoring the denominator to find the zeros, we get . We find and are zeros of multiplicity one but that is a zero of multiplicity two due to the two different factors and . One way to handle this is to note that so
from which we proceed with the partial fraction decomposition
Turning our attention to non-real zeros, we note that the tool of choice to determine the irreducibility of a quadratic is the discriminant, . If , the quadratic admits a pair of non-real complex conjugate zeros. Even though one irreducible quadratic gives two distinct non-real zeros, we list the terms with denominators involving a given irreducible quadratic only once to avoid duplication in the form of the decomposition. The trick, of course, is factoring the denominator or otherwise finding the zeros and their multiplicities in order to apply Theorem. We recommend that the reader review the techniques set forth in Sections and. Next, we state a theorem that if two polynomials are equal, the corresponding coefficients of the like powers of are equal. This is the principal by which we shall determine the unknown coefficients in our partial fraction decomposition.
Believe it or not, the proof of Theorem is a consequence of Theorem. Define to be the difference of the left hand side of the equation in Theorem and the right hand side. Then for all in the open interval . If were a nonzero polynomial of degree , then, by Theorem, could have at most zeros in , and is a finite number. Since for all the in , has infinitely many zeros, and hence, is the zero polynomial. This means there can be no nonzero terms in and the theorem follows. Arguably, the best way to make sense of either of the two preceding theorems is to work some examples.
Exercises
In Exercises -, find only the form needed to begin the process of partial fraction decomposition. Do not create the system of linear equations or attempt to find the actual decomposition.
As we stated at the beginning of this section, the technique of resolving a rational function into partial fractions is a skill needed for Calculus. However, we hope to have shown you that it is worth doing if, for no other reason, it reinforces a hefty amount of algebra. One of the common algebraic errors the authors find students make is something along the lines of
Think about why if the above were true, this section would have no need to exist.
In Exercises -, find the partial fraction decomposition of the following rational expressions.
Answers
Adapted from Precalculus, 3rd corrected edition, by Carl Stitz and Jeff Zeager (stitz-zeager.com), licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Changes were made: reformatted as an accessible XYZ web edition. License: CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0.