Login
📚 Online Statistics Education
Chapters ▾
⇩ Download ▾

1.3 Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics are numbers that are used to summarize and describe data. The word "data" refers to the information that has been collected from an experiment, a survey, a historical record, etc. (By the way, "data" is plural. One piece of information is called a "datum.") If we are analyzing birth certificates, for example, a descriptive statistic might be the percentage of certificates issued in New York State, or the average age of the mother. Any other number we choose to compute also counts as a descriptive statistic for the data from which the statistic is computed. Several descriptive statistics are often used at one time to give a full picture of the data.

Descriptive statistics are just descriptive. They do not involve generalizing beyond the data at hand. Generalizing from our data to another set of cases is the business of inferential statistics, which you'll be studying in another section. Here we focus on (mere) descriptive statistics.

Some descriptive statistics are shown in Table 1. The table shows the average salaries for various occupations in the United States in 1999. (Click here to see how much individuals with other occupations earn.)

Table 1. Average salaries for various occupations in 1999.

$112,760pediatricians
$106,130dentists
$100,090podiatrists
$ 76,140 physicists
$ 53,410 architects
$ 49,720 school, clinical, and counseling psychologists
$ 47,910 flight attendants
$ 39,560 elementary school teachers
$ 38,710 police officers
$ 18,980 floral designers

Descriptive statistics like these offer insight into American society. It is interesting to note, for example, that we pay the people who educate our children and who protect our citizens a great deal less than we pay people who take care of our feet or our teeth.

For more descriptive statistics, consider Table 2 which shows the number of unmarried men per 100 unmarried women in U.S. Metro Areas in 1990. From this table we see that men outnumber women most in Jacksonville, NC, and women outnumber men most in Sarasota, FL. You can see that descriptive statistics can be useful if we are looking for an opposite-sex partner! (These data come from the Information Please Almanac.)

Table 2. Number of unmarried men per 100 unmarried women in U.S. Metro Areas in 1990.

Cities with mostly men Men per 100 Women Cities with mostly women Men per 100 Women
1. Jacksonville, NC 224 1. Sarasota, FL 66
2. Killeen-Temple, TX 123 2. Bradenton, FL 68
3. Fayetteville, NC 118 3. Altoona, PA 69
4. Brazoria, TX 117 4. Springfield, IL 70
5. Lawton, OK 116 5. Jacksonville, TN 70
6. State College, PA 113 6. Gadsden, AL 70
7. Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN-KY 113 7. Wheeling, WV 70
8. Anchorage, Alaska 112 8. Charleston, WV 71
9. Salinas-Seaside-Monterey, CA 112 9. St. Joseph, MO 71
10. Bryan-College Station, TX 111 10. Lynchburg, VA 71

NOTE: Unmarried includes never-married, widowed, and divorced persons, 15 years or older.

These descriptive statistics may make us ponder why the numbers are so disparate in these cities. One potential explanation, for instance, as to why there are more women in Florida than men may involve the fact that elderly individuals tend to move down to the Sarasota region and that women tend to outlive men. Thus, more women might live in Sarasota than men. However, in the absence of proper data, this is only speculation.

You probably know that descriptive statistics are central to the world of sports. Every sporting event produces numerous statistics such as the shooting percentage of players on a basketball team. For the Olympic marathon (a foot race of 26.2 miles), we possess data that cover more than a century of competition. (The first modern Olympics took place in 1896.) The following table shows the winning times for both men and women (the latter have only been allowed to compete since 1984).

Table 3. Winning Olympic marathon times.

YearWinnerCountryTime
YearWinnerCountryTime
Women
1984Joan BenoitUSA2:24:52
1988Rosa MotaPOR2:25:40
1992Valentina YegorovaUT2:32:41
1996Fatuma RobaETH2:26:05
2000Naoko TakahashiJPN2:23:14
2004Mizuki NoguchiJPN2:26:20
Men
1896Spiridon LouisGRE2:58:50
1900Michel TheatoFRA2:59:45
1904Thomas HicksUSA3:28:53
1906Billy SherringCAN2:51:23
1908Johnny HayesUSA2:55:18
1912Kenneth McArthurS. Afr.2:36:54
1920Hannes KolehmainenFIN2:32:35
1924Albin StenroosFIN2:41:22
1928Boughra El OuafiFRA2:32:57
1932Juan Carlos ZabalaARG2:31:36
1936Sohn Kee-ChungJPN2:29:19
1948Delfo CabreraARG2:34:51
1952Emil ZtopekCZE2:23:03
1956Alain MimounFRA2:25:00
1960Abebe BikilaETH2:15:16
1964Abebe BikilaETH2:12:11
1968Mamo WoldeETH2:20:26
1972Frank ShorterUSA2:12:19
1976Waldemar CierpinskiE.Ger2:09:55
1980Waldemar CierpinskiE.Ger2:11:03
1984Carlos LopesPOR2:09:21
1988Gelindo BordinITA2:10:32
1992Hwang Young-ChoS. Kor2:13:23
1996Josia ThugwaneS. Afr.2:12:36
2000Gezahenge AberaETH2:10.10
2004Stefano BaldiniITA2:10:55

There are many descriptive statistics that we can compute from the data in the table. To gain insight into the improvement in speed over the years, let us divide the men's times into two pieces, namely, the first 13 races (up to 1952) and the second 13 (starting from 1956). The mean winning time for the first 13 races is 2 hours, 44 minutes, and 22 seconds (written 2:44:22). The mean winning time for the second 13 races is 2:13:18. This is quite a difference (over half an hour). Does this prove that the fastest men are running faster? Or is the difference just due to chance, no more than what often emerges from chance differences in performance from year to year? We can't answer this question with descriptive statistics alone. All we can affirm is that the two means are "suggestive."

Examining Table 3 leads to many other questions. We note that Takahashi (the lead female runner in 2000) would have beaten the male runner in 1956 and all male runners in the first 12 marathons. This fact leads us to ask whether the gender gap will close or remain constant. When we look at the times within each gender, we also wonder how much they will decrease (if at all) in the next century of the Olympics. Might we one day witness a sub-2 hour marathon? The study of statistics can help you make reasonable guesses about the answers to these questions.

Adapted from Online Statistics Education: A Multimedia Course of Study (onlinestatbook.com), Project Leader: David M. Lane, Rice University. Developed with NSF support. The original work is in the public domain; it is cited here at the authors' request. Changes were made: reformatted as an accessible XYZ web edition with native MathML. License: Public-Domain.