#set document(title: "3.3 Multiple-Slit Interference", author: "OpenStax / XYZ Homework") #set page(width: 8.5in, height: auto, margin: 1in) #import "@preview/cetz:0.5.2" #set text(font: ("STIX Two Text", "Libertinus Serif", "New Computer Modern"), size: 10.5pt, lang: "en") #show math.equation: set text(font: ("STIX Two Math", "New Computer Modern Math")) #set par(justify: true, leading: 0.62em, spacing: 0.9em) #set enum(spacing: 1.1em) // room between list items so tall inline fractions don't collide #set list(spacing: 1.1em) #set table(stroke: 0.5pt + rgb("#c7ccd3")) #let BLUE = rgb("#183B6F") // brand navy — section bars + example/solution labels (white on navy 11.09:1) #let ORANGE = rgb("#A94509") // brand primary-700 — AA-safe deep orange for TEXT (5.93:1 on white; raw brand #F37021 is 2.94:1 and must never carry text) #let RED = rgb("#DC2626") // brand error-600 #let GREEN = rgb("#059669") // brand success-600 (decoration only; small green text uses green-text #007942) #show heading.where(level: 1): it => block(width: 100%, above: 0pt, below: 16pt, fill: gradient.linear(BLUE, rgb("#2C5AA0")), inset: (x: 14pt, y: 12pt), radius: 3pt, text(fill: white, weight: "bold", size: 19pt, it.body)) #show heading.where(level: 2): it => block(width: 100%, above: 18pt, below: 10pt, fill: BLUE, inset: (x: 10pt, y: 6pt), radius: 2pt, text(fill: white, weight: "bold", size: 12pt, it.body)) #show heading.where(level: 3): it => text(fill: ORANGE, weight: "bold", size: 12.5pt, it.body) #show heading.where(level: 4): it => text(fill: BLUE, weight: "bold", size: 10.5pt, it.body) #let examplebox(label, title, body) = block(width: 100%, breakable: true, fill: rgb("#EFF1F5"), stroke: 0.5pt + rgb("#CFDDF0"), radius: 4pt, inset: 10pt, above: 12pt, below: 12pt)[ #block(below: 6pt)[#box(fill: BLUE, inset: (x: 6pt, y: 2pt), radius: 2pt, text(fill: white, weight: "bold", size: 8.5pt, label)) #h(0.4em) #strong[#title]] #body] // rail = decorative left rule (raw brand token); labelcolor = AA-safe label text shade #let notebox(label, rail, labelcolor, tint, body) = block(width: 100%, breakable: true, fill: tint, stroke: (left: 3pt + rail), inset: (left: 10pt, rest: 8pt), radius: (right: 4pt), above: 11pt, below: 11pt)[ #text(fill: labelcolor, weight: "bold", size: 7.5pt, tracking: 0.5pt)[#upper(label)] #linebreak() #body] #let solutionbox(body) = block(above: 4pt, below: 8pt)[ #text(fill: BLUE, weight: "bold", size: 8.5pt)[Solution] #linebreak() #body] #let figph(msg) = block(width: 100%, height: 60pt, fill: rgb("#f6f7f9"), stroke: (paint: rgb("#c7ccd3"), dash: "dashed"), radius: 4pt, inset: 10pt)[ #align(center + horizon, text(fill: rgb("#889"), style: "italic", size: 9pt, msg))] // Standardize inlined figure sizes: measure the natural CeTZ canvas, then scale to a // consistent envelope (aspect-aware; see build_typst.py FIG_* constants). Unlike the // print preamble, dimensions are FLOORED: in an editor a user can trim a figure to a // degenerate 1-D shape (a bare line), and w/h or tw/w would then divide by zero. #let _STD_W = 3.5 #let _WIDE_W = 5.6 #let _MAX_H = 3.4 #let _ASPECT_WIDE = 2.2 #let _UPSCALE_MAX = 1.15 #let stdfig(body) = context { let m = measure(body) let w = calc.max(m.width / 1in, 0.01) let h = calc.max(m.height / 1in, 0.01) let tw = if w / h > _ASPECT_WIDE { _WIDE_W } else { _STD_W } let s = calc.min(tw / w, _MAX_H / h, _UPSCALE_MAX) align(center, box(scale(x: s * 100%, y: s * 100%, reflow: true, body))) } #show figure: set block(breakable: false) #set figure(gap: 8pt) #show figure.caption: set text(size: 8.5pt, fill: rgb("#555")) == 3.3#h(0.6em)Multiple-Slit Interference Analyzing the interference of light passing through two slits lays out the theoretical framework of interference and gives us a historical insight into Thomas Young’s experiments. However, much of the modern-day application of slit interference uses not just two slits but many, approaching infinity for practical purposes. The key optical element is called a diffraction grating, an important tool in optical analysis, which we discuss in detail in Diffraction. Here, we start the analysis of multiple-slit interference by taking the results from our analysis of the double slit (#math.equation(block: false, alt: "N equals 2")[$N = 2$]) and extending it to configurations with three, four, and much larger numbers of slits. shows the simplest case of multiple-slit interference, with three slits, or #math.equation(block: false, alt: "N equals 3")[$N = 3$]. The spacing between slits is #emph[d], and the path length difference between adjacent slits is #math.equation(block: false, alt: "d sin θ")[$d #h(0.2em) "sin" #h(0.2em) θ$], same as the case for the double slit. What is new is that the path length difference for the first and the third slits is #math.equation(block: false, alt: "2 d sin θ")[$2 d #h(0.2em) "sin" #h(0.2em) θ$]. The condition for constructive interference is the same as for the double slit, that is #math.equation(block: true, alt: "d sin θ equals m λ .")[$d #h(0.2em) "sin" #h(0.2em) θ = m λ .$] When this condition is met, #math.equation(block: false, alt: "2 d sin θ")[$2 d #h(0.2em) "sin" #h(0.2em) θ$] is automatically a multiple of #math.equation(block: false, alt: "λ")[$λ$], so all three rays combine constructively, and the bright fringes that occur here are called #strong[principal maxima]. But what happens when the path length difference between adjacent slits is only #math.equation(block: false, alt: "λ / 2")[$λ "/" 2$]? We can think of the first and second rays as interfering destructively, but the third ray remains unaltered. Instead of obtaining a dark fringe, or a minimum, as we did for the double slit, we see a #strong[secondary maximum] with intensity lower than the principal maxima. #figure(figph[Picture shows interference with three slits separated by distance d. Rays 1, 2, and 3 travel through the slits at the angles Theta.], alt: "Picture shows interference with three slits separated by distance d. Rays 1, 2, and 3 travel through the slits at the angles Theta.", caption: [Interference with three slits. Different pairs of emerging rays can combine constructively or destructively at the same time, leading to secondary maxima.]) In general, for #emph[N] slits, these secondary maxima occur whenever an unpaired ray is present that does not go away due to destructive interference. This occurs at #math.equation(block: false, alt: "open parenthesis N minus 2 close parenthesis")[$( N − 2 )$] evenly spaced positions between the principal maxima. The amplitude of the electromagnetic wave is correspondingly diminished to #math.equation(block: false, alt: "1 / N")[$1 "/" N$] of the wave at the principal maxima, and the light intensity, being proportional to the square of the wave amplitude, is diminished to #math.equation(block: false, alt: "1 / N squared")[$1 "/" N^(2)$] of the intensity compared to the principal maxima. As shows, a dark fringe is located between every maximum (principal or secondary). As #emph[N] grows larger and the number of bright and dark fringes increase, the widths of the maxima become narrower due to the closely located neighboring dark fringes. Because the total amount of light energy remains unaltered, narrower maxima require that each maximum reaches a correspondingly higher intensity. #figure(figph[Picture A shows a graph for the interference fringe patterns for two, three and four slits. As the number of slits increases, more secondary maxima appear, but the principal maxima become narrower. Picture B shows photographs of fringe patterns for two, three and four slits. As the number of slits increases, more secondary maxima appear, but the principal maxima become brighter.], alt: "Picture A shows a graph for the interference fringe patterns for two, three and four slits. As the number of slits increases, more secondary maxima appear, but the principal maxima become narrower. Picture B shows photographs of fringe patterns for two, three and four slits. As the number of slits increases, more secondary maxima appear, but the principal maxima become brighter.", caption: [Interference fringe patterns for two, three and four slits. As the number of slits increases, more secondary maxima appear, but the principal maxima become brighter and narrower. (a) Graph and (b) photographs of fringe patterns.]) === Summary - Interference from multiple slits (#math.equation(block: false, alt: "N greater than 2")[$N > 2$]) produces principal as well as secondary maxima. - As the number of slits is increased, the intensity of the principal maxima increases and the width decreases. === Problems Ten narrow slits are equally spaced 0.25 mm apart and illuminated with yellow light of wavelength 580 nm. (a) What are the angular positions of the third and fourth principal maxima? (b) What is the separation of these maxima on a screen 2.0 m from the slits? #solutionbox[ a. #math.equation(block: false, alt: "0.40 ° , 0.53 ° ;")[$0.40 "°" , 0.53 "°" ;$] b. #math.equation(block: false, alt: "4.6 times 10 to the power −3 m")[$4.6 #h(0.2em) × #h(0.2em) 10^(−3) #h(0.2em) "m"$] ] The width of bright fringes can be calculated as the separation between the two adjacent dark fringes on either side. Find the angular widths of the third- and fourth-order bright fringes from the preceding problem. For a three-slit interference pattern, find the ratio of the peak intensities of a secondary maximum to a principal maximum. #solutionbox[ 1:9 ] What is the angular width of the central fringe of the interference pattern of (a) 20 slits separated by #math.equation(block: false, alt: "d equals 2.0 times 10 to the power −3 mm")[$d = 2.0 #h(0.2em) × #h(0.2em) 10^(−3) "mm"$]? (b) 50 slits with the same separation? Assume that #math.equation(block: false, alt: "λ equals 600 nm")[$λ = 600 #h(0.2em) "nm"$].